For the people, politics and politics of Colorado
What is the spot? You are reading an episode of our weekly policy newsletter. Sign up here to have it delivered straight to your inbox.
Surely Heidi Ganahl knew the question came: do you accept the 2020 election result as legitimate?
Undoubtedly above any other question, an answer indicates whether a candidate has confidence in the basic function of a democracy he seeks to help lead. So it’s no surprise that Ganahl, the biggest name in the GOP in Colorado’s 2022 gubernatorial race, was questioned at least three times on Tuesday, Day 1 of his campaign.
She didn’t have an answer. The first time she was interviewed by the Colorado Sun, she spoke in general terms about how important it is for people to “have confidence that their vote counts.” The second time around, she told the Denver Post that she was not going to “go into this right now.” The third time, she criticized 9News for asking such a “conflicting” question.
The question is a litmus test: will she come forward as a more moderate Republican who is willing to say things that might upset the base, or will she come forward with the base and risk herself? alienate the moderates?
Recent history tells us that trying to credibly run both paths is not easy. Cory Gardner attempted this when he aligned himself with Donald Trump, but ran advertisements about being two-party and independent-minded. Reporters had many questions for him, but he rarely spoke to local media and left many questions unanswered.
The GOP split that Ganahl must navigate will be on display this weekend, when the state party votes on a proposal, led by the far-right, to shut its main process down to a few thousand die-hards. To do so would mean excluding millions of Republican and unaffiliated voters from the GOP primary.
Journalists asked Ganahl on Tuesday which side she sided with – another decisive question.
His answer ? “I’m not going to go in there.”
To support the important journalism we do, you can subscribe to The Denver Post here.
Got a question about Colorado politics? Submit it here and it will go straight to the Denver Post Policy Team.
Aurora Police Department must make changes after a state investigation found racist police. Read more here.
Capitol Journal • By Saja Hindi
Fight for the right to abortion
Colorado Attorney General Phi Weiser announced this week that he has signed the US Department of Justice lawsuit challenging Texas’ six-week abortion ban.
“I am committed to defending women’s reproductive rights and equality, and the new Texas law violates a long-standing US Supreme Court precedent by denying women their constitutionally protected right to take their own healthcare decisions, ”Weiser said in a statement.
Texas Senate Bill 8, which came into effect earlier this month, bans nearly all abortions in the state and allows private citizens to enforce it by giving them the ability to sue anyone who performs an abortion or help someone get one (including advice or a trip to a clinic).
Colorado abortion rights groups are bracing for an increase in patient numbers, and advocacy group Cobalt said in the week following the Texas ban that half of the clients the association aimed for. nonprofit helped through its abortion fund came from Texas. The attorneys general’s brief cited impacts on vendors across the country, including Colorado.
But Texas law isn’t the only challenge Roe v. Wade. Mississippi officials have asked the United States Supreme Court to maintain a state law in place banning abortions after 15 weeks.
Reproductive rights advocates say cases like these will continue to happen unless Congress acts. Cobalt and others support the “Women’s Health Protection Act,” which would enshrine the right to abortion into federal law. Colorado Democrats in Congress signed the legislation as cosponsors.
Other Colorado Policy News
Federal policy • By Justin Wingerter
The judge agrees with Lamborn
A federal judge sided with U.S. Representative Doug Lamborn and agreed to let a Colorado court handle the lawsuit brought against him by former staff member Brandon Pope.
Lamborn, R-Colorado Springs, wanted him here rather than the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Obama-appointed judge James Boasberg ruled Wednesday that Colorado had “strong ties to this dispute.”
“In short, this case concerns the employment dispute of a Colorado resident with his Colorado-based employer, who is also a representative of the people of Colorado,” Boasberg wrote.
The Pope sued Lamborn in May, alleging he was fired for speaking out against Lamborn’s disregard for COVID-19 security protocols and the personal use of government resources by the Lamborn family. Lamborn has largely denied the charges. No hearing was scheduled for Thursday afternoon.
Other Federal Policy News
Mile High Politics • By Joe Rubino
To some members of the city council’s finance and governance committee, it appeared that Mayor Michael Hancock’s request for council to allocate $ 5 million in bonuses for city staff members who were complying with his COVID vaccine mandate – 19 was coming out of left field.
On Tuesday, that committee voted to maintain Hancock’s request until its September 28 meeting to discuss it further rather than sending it to the board as a whole. This second hearing only takes place two days before the deadline set by Hancock for city employees to get vaccinated, get a waiver or face possible disciplinary action.
Board members wondered how the administration arrived at the $ 400 per employee figure and what the administration believes is the purpose of these payments. CFO Brendan Hanlon told them it was recognition, not last-minute incitement to holdouts.
City Councilor Robin Kniech disputed whether people eligible for a religious exemption would get bonuses, saying she saw this as the government paying people for their religion – and the city shouldn’t.
“We should pay the people who have taken active measures to prevent the transmission of COVID,” she said.
More news about Denver and its suburbs
Pass this newsletter on to your colleagues and encourage them to subscribe.